🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie Botts is an adorable small “playful character”. Orion – nicknamed “Onion” – is a sizeable but fiercely protective friend. Another whale, Zephyr has “constant motion” and wiggles like a wiggly creature. Lillooet is the “loving presence” with a heart of gold.

A group of thirty captive marine mammals in a Canada-based entertainment facility have been caught in a struggle between a shuttered park, government authorities and animal rights activists.

But those working directly with the whales say the intense controversy over their future often overlooks the complexities of the whales who, after growing up in confinement, have been carefully observed by the people who interact with them daily.

After the federal government blocked the export of the belugas to a foreign facility, the controversial amusement park near Niagara Falls where they are kept warned to put them down unless the federal government covers the cost of their care. Canada’s marine resources official has rejected that demand, placing the thirty whales in an ever more uncertain situation.

Intelligent Sea Creatures

Researchers say that belugas’ neuroanatomy, along with their mimicry abilities, cognitive challenges and group interactions point to they are deeply intelligent animals – something a former trainer observed personally.

Burgess spent a significant period as a marine mammal specialist, a position that entailed earning the trust of the sea creatures.

“Establishing those bonds over time takes a lot of regularity and a lot of love. At the beginning, they’re very wary of you,” she said. “In time, you gain reciprocal understanding. And they start being more trusting with you. It’s just so extraordinary and fulfilling.”

The trainer knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was even so amazed by the nuances and idiosyncrasies in their characters. She cultivated a particular love for two female belugas with opposing natures.

“One whale chose me. Cleo required effort,” she said. “They changed the way I view connection.”

Public Concerns and Facility Decline

Her connection with the whales progressed against a backdrop of increasing societal concern to their captivity.

During her time at the park, seven belugas and the park’s single orca, Kiska, succumbed. In all, 19 belugas have perished at the park since recent years, a statistic which the park ascribes to expected lifespan, but which campaigners say indicates the poor conditions in which they were maintained.

The park did not open to the public over the recent season, but Burgess says she observed directly effects of the closure. “Structural materials is deteriorating from the enclosures because they’re in disrepair and not being repaired. The whales are curious and so they take pieces and move about with fragments in their jaws. It’s distressing to see.”

The park did not respond to a questionnaire, but earlier claimed: “The whales … receive far superior health care and constant care than any human in the UK, or other places.”

Uncertain Future and Potential Resolutions

The former employee was fired from the park in recent months following the death of Eos, an ailing beluga the employees had to put down. She said the facility suspected particulars of the death were leaked to the media and she was fired shortly thereafter.

The uncertainty over the whales’ outcome has left Burgess and current and former trainers in distress. She says the facility’s ultimatum to kill its whales is a leverage tool and is a “practically unfeasible” undertaking, adding any attempts to humanely kill even a one beluga would require “significant personnel”, trucks and heavy equipment.

“It cannot happen in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.

She supports demands for the whales to be transferred promptly from the facility, with its crumbling tanks and reduced personnel.

In recent months, the nation’s fisheries minister turned down a request to send the whales to China.

“Allowing the proposal would have meant a perpetual situation in captivity and a reversion to performance for audiences,” the official commented. “As society, we know that whales belong in the sea, not in enclosures for our amusement. I could not in ethical standing approve an transfer that would continue the conditions these belugas have endured.”

But the former trainer said the official’s remarks reveal a more general incorrect perception of the realities of life for belugas living their whole lives in enclosures.

“The public needs to realize these are whales that have spent their whole lives in captivity and they will need ongoing assistance for the remainder of their lives,” she said. “People just don’t realize that it’s not as simple as saying ‘end operations’.”

Sanctuary Proposal and Ongoing Debate

As decision makers attempt to find a resolution, suggestions have been put forward, some of which have little basis in reality. A suggested plan called for the belugas to be released into the natural habitat of the Arctic – where whales are a important part of sustenance for local populations.

A planned protected area in the province of eastern Canada, which has received government approval, has shown to be contentious. The planned location, which includes extensive space of protected cove, is not yet built. Advocates remain positive that it could ultimately represent a permanent resolution for eight of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among trainers she’s spoken with, there is “skepticism there” about what she said is “merely an trial” in the whales’ well-being.

Some experts say the possibility of a protected habitat indicates a broader global shift away from zoos and aquariums and could represent a viable approach in the short term.

An official, leader of the initiative, said the location will replicate the cognitive activities and diet the whales obtain from specialists, albeit in a more expansive space. He said after the well-being of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|